Every document belongs to a matter, and every matter has the same six folders. The filing is entirely predictable, which is exactly why nobody wants to be the one doing it.
The short answer
Legal filing is rule-bound and repetitive: a document belongs to a matter, and within it to pleadings, correspondence, discovery, billing or client documents. That structure rarely changes, which makes it a good fit for a workflow. Describe the matter structure once, and a workflow watching the folder reads each document, uses the Rename step to name it by date and type, and the Move step to file it into the right matter. Documents arriving as email attachments get a home first via the Save a Copy step.
Steps this uses
Before and after
As they arrive
After the workflow
Three documents routed to two matters, filed by type within each.
Setting it up
The folders you already use per matter. You are describing the structure you have, not adopting a new one.
Wherever documents land — a cloud storage folder, or a mailbox for correspondence and service copies.
The Read Details from File step identifies the matter and the document type from the document, and the Move step files it accordingly.
The Ask a Person to Approve step can pause the workflow before anything is filed, which is worth the friction for documents with deadlines attached.
The structure is stable and the vocabulary is standard. Unlike general business filing, where categories are argued about, a legal matter has an established shape that changes rarely. That predictability is precisely what makes describing it once and applying it forever a reasonable proposition.
Anything with a deadline or a privilege question attached. The Ask a Person to Approve step exists for this: the workflow proposes the matter and the folder, and a person confirms before it is written. Reserve it for documents where misfiling has consequences rather than applying it to everything, which only teaches people to approve without reading.
This is filing, not practice management and not a records system. It does not run conflict checks, it does not build ethical walls between matters, it does not track deadlines, and it does not maintain a retention schedule you could defend to a regulator. If those are your requirements, you need a legal document management system and this sits alongside it.
FAQ
By matter, with a consistent set of folders inside each — pleadings, correspondence, discovery, billing, client documents. The structure is stable enough that a workflow can apply it: each document is read, named by date and type, and filed into the right matter automatically.
Yes. A workflow reads each document, identifies the matter and document type from its contents, and the Move step files it. Documents arriving as email attachments are given a home first by the Save a Copy step.
No. It files documents. Conflict checking, ethical walls, deadline tracking and defensible retention are the job of a practice management or legal document management system.
Yes. The Ask a Person to Approve step pauses the workflow so someone confirms the matter and folder before anything is written. It is worth using on documents with deadlines or privilege questions attached.
Every document to its matter, named by date and type.
Try The Drive AI Free5 GB free · No credit card required